You can’t understand European history at all other than through religion, or English literature either if you can’t recognise biblical allusions.
When a company seeks a new chief executive officer, or a university a new vice-chancellor, enormous trouble is taken to find the best person.
We humans are an extremely important manifestation of the replication bomb, because it is through us – through our brains, our symbolic culture and our technology – that the explosion may proceed to the next stage and reverberate through deep space.
Today the theory of evolution is about as much open to doubt as the theory that the earth goes round the sun.
There are risks in the sheer brevity of Twitter, and it’s actually quite an elegant art reducing what you have to say to 140 characters, and it’s something that I quite enjoy attempting to do.
The word ‘excess’ has no meaning for a male.
The solution often turns out more beautiful than the puzzle.
The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing, is a fact so staggering that I would be mad to attempt words to do it justice.
Something pretty mysterious had to give rise to the origin of the universe.
Religious organisations have an automatic tax-free charitable status.
Personally, I rather look forward to a computer program winning the world chess championship. Humanity needs a lesson in humility.
Notoriously, the United States is the most religious of the Western advanced nations. It’s a bit mysterious why that is.
Metaphors are fine if they aid understanding, but sometimes they get in the way.
It is possible in medicine, even when you intend to do good, to do harm instead. That is why science thrives on actively encouraging criticism rather than stifling it.
In the case of Stalinism, people actually distorted science because it was for the good of the Communist Party.
If there is a God, it’s going to be a whole lot bigger and a whole lot more incomprehensible than anything that any theologian of any religion has ever proposed.
I’m quite a softy, yes. I have a blank spot with respect to visual art, but I have perhaps a compensating hypersensitivity to poetry and music.
I would like people to appreciate science in the same way they appreciate the arts.
I think it’s misleading to use a word like ‘God’ in the way Einstein did. I’m sorry that Einstein did. I think he was asking for trouble, and he certainly was misunderstood.
I live in a post-Christian world in Oxford; it is quite rare to meet somebody who is religious in academic life now, and there is absolutely no tendency for rioting and mayhem, and it is extremely civilised.
I don’t actually think ‘The Selfish Gene’ is a very good title. I think that’s one of my worst titles.
I certainly would absolutely never do what some of my American colleagues do and object to religious symbols being used, putting crosses up in the public square and things like that. I don’t fret about that at all; I’m quite happy about that.
How can you take seriously someone who likes to believe something because he finds it ‘comforting’?
Evolution never looks to the future.
Disagreements between incompatible beliefs cannot be settled by reasoned argument because reasoned argument is drummed out of those trained in religion from the cradle.
Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.
Although many of us fear death, I think there is something illogical about it.
A constellation is not an entity at all, not the kind of thing that Uranus, or anything else, can sensibly be said to ‘move into.’
You can’t imagine how gratifying it is to have a reader come up to you and say, ‘You changed my life.’
What’s wrong with being elitist if you are trying to encourage people to join the elite rather than being exclusive?
We have to find our own purposes in life, which are not derived directly from our scientific history.
To put it bluntly, American political opportunities are heavily loaded against those who are simultaneously intelligent and honest.
There are quite a lot of YouTube clips of me that have gone viral. One that I think of is of a young woman at a lecture I was giving – she came from Liberty University, which is a ludicrous religious institution. She said, ‘What if you are wrong?’ and I answered that rather briefly, and that’s gone viral.
The whole idea of creating saints, it’s pure ‘Monty Python.’ They have to clock up two miracles.
The reason we personify things like cars and computers is that just as monkeys live in an arboreal world and moles live in an underground world and water striders live in a surface tension-dominated flatland, we live in a social world.
The essence of life is statistical improbability on a colossal scale.
Something about the cultural tradition of Jews is way, way more sympathetic to science and learning and intellectual pursuits than Islam.
Religious fanatics want people to switch off their own minds, ignore the evidence, and blindly follow a holy book based upon private ‘revelation’.
People say I’m shrill and strident.
Nothing is wrong with peace and love. It is all the more regrettable that so many of Christ’s followers seem to disagree.
Many people want to send their children to faith schools because they get good exam results, but they’re not foolish enough to believe that it’s because of faith that they get good exam results.
It is interesting – you find in the United States, there is a kind of anti-education hostility. It’s the sort of Sarah Palin constituency which does seem to actually be hostile to the New York, Boston, San Francisco educated elite. You know, ‘We good plain folks from the middle of the country are just as good as you pointy-headed intellectuals.’
In the 1920s and 1930s, scientists from both the political left and right would not have found the idea of designer babies particularly dangerous – though, of course, they would not have used that phrase.
If there are other worlds elsewhere in the universe, I would conjecture they are governed by the same laws of natural selection.
I’m pretty sure there is some genetic component towards intelligence.
I was never much bothered about moral questions like, ‘How could there be a good God when there’s so much evil in the world?’
I think I would abolish schools which systematically inculcate sectarian beliefs.
I like to think ‘The God Delusion’ is a humorous book. I think, actually, it’s full of laughs. And people who describe it as a polarizing book or as an aggressive book, it’s just that very often they haven’t read it.
I do understand people when they say that you destroy the magic of childhood if you encourage too much skeptical questioning.
I can remember at the age of about six being fascinated by the planets and learning all about Mars and Venus and things.
How any government could promote the Vardy academies in the North-East of England is absolutely beyond me. Tony Blair defends them on grounds of diversity, but it should be unthinkable in the 21st century to have a school whose head of science believes the world is less than 10,000 years old.
Evil is a miscellaneous collection of nasty things that nasty people do.
Design can never be an ultimate explanation for anything. It can only be a proximate explanation. A plane or a car is explained by a designer but that’s because the designer himself, the engineer, is explained by natural selection.
Bereavement is terrible, of course. And when somebody you love dies, it’s a time for reflection, a time for memory, a time for regret.
All the great religions have a place for awe, for ecstatic transport at the wonder and beauty of creation.
You can’t even begin to understand biology, you can’t understand life, unless you understand what it’s all there for, how it arose – and that means evolution.
What’s going to happen when I die? I may be buried, or I may be cremated, I may give my body to science. I haven’t decided yet.
We have the power to turn against our creators.
To fill a world with religion, or religions of the Abrahamic kind, is like littering the streets with loaded guns. Do not be surprised if they are used.
There are people who try to get atheists to form a sort of atheist church and have atheist community singsongs and things. I don’t see the need for that, but if people want to do it, why shouldn’t they?
The very large brain that humans have, plus the things that go along with it – language, art, science – seemed to have evolved only once. The eye, by contrast, independently evolved 40 times. So, if you were to ‘replay’ evolution, the eye would almost certainly appear again, whereas the big brain probably wouldn’t.
The question of whether there exists a supernatural creator, a God, is one of the most important that we have to answer. I think that it is a scientific question. My answer is no.
The enlightenment is under threat. So is reason. So is truth. So is science, especially in the schools of America.
Selfish genes actually explain altruistic individuals, and to me that’s crystal-clear.
Religion teaches you to be satisfied with nonanswers. It’s a sort of crime against childhood.
People really, really hate their religion being criticized. It’s as though you’ve said they had an ugly face; they seem to identify personally with it.
Nico Tinbergen was my doctoral supervisor, and he was a benign, avuncular sort of influence; everybody loved him.
Many of us saw religion as harmless nonsense. Beliefs might lack all supporting evidence but, we thought, if people needed a crutch for consolation, where’s the harm? September 11th changed all that.
It is immoral to brand children with religion. ‘This is a Catholic child.’ ‘That is a Muslim child.’ I want everyone to flinch when they hear such a phrase, just as they would if they heard, ‘That is a Marxist child.’
In Britain, you don’t usually learn about evolution until you are about 15. I should have thought that you should start at about 8. But I could be wrong about that.
If something is true, no amount of wishful thinking will change it.
I’m not one of those who wants to purge our society of our Christian history.
I was confirmed at my prep school at the age of 13.
I think a fundamentalist is somebody who believes something unshakably and isn’t going to change their mind.
I have often said that I am a passionate Darwinian when it comes to explaining why we exist.
I do think imagination is enormously valuable, and that children should be encouraged in their imagination. That’s very true.
I can handle heckling on evolution because it’s my own field.
God stands out in the universe as the most glaring of all superfluous sore thumbs.
Every night of our lives, we dream, and our brain concocts visions which are, at least until we wake up, highly convincing. Most of us have had experiences which are verging on hallucination. It shows the power of the brain to knock up illusions.
Darwin gives courage to the rest of science that we shall end up understanding literally everything, springing from almost nothing – a thought extremely hard to comprehend and believe.
Beauty arises out of human inspiration.
All the fossils that we have ever found have always been found in the appropriate place in the time sequence. There are no fossils in the wrong place.
You can legally lie about the real world to your heart’s content, but until some human being is materially damaged, nobody will complain.
What matters is not the facts but how you discover and think about them.
We have a huge amount of DNA in common with jellyfish.
To an honest judge, the alleged marriage between religion and science is a shallow, empty, spin-doctored sham.
There are many very educated people who are religious, but they’re not creationists.
The very idea that we get a moral compass from religion is horrible. Not only should we not get our moral compass from religion, as a matter of fact we don’t.
The psychologist Elizabeth Loftus has shown great courage, in the face of spiteful vested interests, in demonstrating how easy it is for people to concoct memories that are entirely false but which seem, to the victim, every bit as real as true memories.
The earliest books in the New Testament to be written were the Epistles, not the Gospels. It’s almost as though Saint Paul and others who wrote the Epistles weren’t that interested in whether Jesus was real.
Segregation has no place in the education system.
Religion is capable of driving people to such dangerous folly that faith seems to me to qualify as a kind of mental illness.
People like to trace their ancestry.
Natural selection will not remove ignorance from future generations.
Let us understand what our own selfish genes are up to because we may then at least have the chance to upset their designs.
It is a lamentable observation that because of the way our laws are skewed toward the plaintiff, London has become the libel capital of the world.
In Britain, Christianity is dying. Islam, unfortunately, isn’t.
If saying that religion should be a private matter and should not have special influence in public life is illiberal, then 74% of U.K. Christians are illiberal, too.
I’m not much given to straight, irony-free hero-worship.
I was brought up in a family which valued natural history. Both my parents knew the names of all the British wildflowers, so as we went walking the country, I was constantly being exposed to a natural history sort of knowledge.
I sympathize with politicians who have to watch every syllable they utter for fear it will be misused by somebody with an agenda.
I have begun several projects which were never completed, not necessarily because they failed, but because I got interested in other things.
I do sometimes accuse people of ignorance, but that is not intended to be an insult. I’m ignorant of lots of things. Ignorance is something that can be remedied by education.
I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours.
God exists, if only in the form of a meme with high survival value, or infective power, in the environment provided by human culture.
Even if you believe a creator god invented the laws of physics, would you so insult him as to suggest that he might capriciously and arbitrarily violate them in order to walk on water, or turn water into wine as a cheap party trick at a wedding?
Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature more difficult to explain than simple, statistically probable things.
At the deepest level, all living things that have ever been looked at have the same DNA code. And many of the same genes.
A universe with a God would look quite different from a universe without one. A physics, a biology where there is a God is bound to look different. So the most basic claims of religion are scientific. Religion is a scientific theory.
Words are not trivial. They matter because they raise consciousness.
What is the purpose of the universe?’ is a silly question.
We frequently look into the future of mankind and see dangers. We see if we carry on doing what we are doing in 20 years’ time there will be no rainforests left, just to use one example. Looking into the future may be one of the reasons that brains evolved in the first place.
There’s clearly a lot of Ludditism, and you see it in all the hysteria about every scientific story.
There are many religious points of view where the conservation of the world is just as important as it is to scientists.
The very idea of supernatural magic – including miracles – is incoherent, devoid of sensible meaning.
The population of the U.S. is nearly 300 million, including many of the best educated, most talented, most resourceful, humane people on earth. By almost any measure of civilised attainment, from Nobel prize-counts on down, the U.S. leads the world by miles.
The child has no way of knowing what’s good information.
Secularism is categorically not saying that the religious may not speak out publicly or have a say in public life. It is about saying that religion alone should not confer a privileged say in public life, or greater influence on it. It really is as simple as that.
Religion is about turning untested belief into unshakable truth through the power of institutions and the passage of time.
People believe the only alternative to randomness is intelligent design.
Natural selection is anything but random.
Let us try to teach generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish.
It has become almost a cliche to remark that nobody boasts of ignorance of literature, but it is socially acceptable to boast ignorance of science and proudly claim incompetence in mathematics.
If your plane is being hijacked by an armed man who, though prepared to take risks, presumably wants to go on living, there is room for bargaining.
If I say that I am more interested in preventing the slaughter of large whales than I am in improving housing conditions for people, I am likely to shock some of my friends.
I’m not a good observer. I’m not proud of it.
I want very much to communicate science to as wide an audience as possible, but not at a cost of dumbing down, and not at a cost in getting things right.
I suppose if you look back to your early childhood you accept everything people tell you, and that includes a heavy dose of irrationality – you’re told about tooth fairies and Father Christmas and things.
I have a strong feeling that the subject of evolution is beautiful without the excuse of creationists needing to be bashed.
I do feel visceral revulsion at the burka because for me it is a symbol of the oppression of women.
I am very comfortable with the idea that we can override biology with free will.
George Bush is a catastrophe for the world. And a dream for Bin Laden.
Even if ‘going retrograde’ or ‘moving into Aquarius’ were real phenomena, something that planets actually do, what influence could they possibly have on human events? A planet is so far away that its gravitational pull on a new-born baby would be swamped by the gravitational pull of the doctor’s paunch.
Compassionate doctors sometimes lie to patients about the severity of their condition, and it is not always wrong to do so.
At least the fundamentalists haven’t tried to dilute their message. Their faith is exposed for what it is for all to see.
A universe with a creator would be a totally different kind of universe, scientifically speaking, than one without.
Why are we so obsessed with monogamous fidelity?
What has ‘theology’ ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody? When has ‘theology’ ever said anything that is demonstrably true and is not obvious? What makes you think that ‘theology’ is a subject at all?
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
There’s a mystical strain in every country, and eclipses are likely to bring that out.
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.
The central dogma of the New Testament is that Jesus died as a scapegoat for the sin of Adam and the sins that all we unborn generations might have been contemplating in the future. Adam’s sin is perhaps mitigated by the extenuating circumstance that he didn’t exist.
Science, as opposed to technology, does violence to common sense.
Publishers like a good buzz, and negative responses sell books just as well as positive ones.
One of the things that is wrong with religion is that it teaches us to be satisfied with answers which are not really answers at all.
My thoughts, my beliefs, my feelings are all in my brain. My brain is going to rot.
It’s very likely that most mammals have consciousness, and probably birds, too.
Isn’t it sad to go to your grave without ever wondering why you were born? Who, with such a thought, would not spring from bed, eager to resume discovering the world and rejoicing to be part of it?
If you think about it, 534 members of the U.S. Congress cannot all be religious. That’s just statistical nonsense. Many of them are quite well-educated.
If children understand that beliefs should be substantiated with evidence, as opposed to tradition, authority, revelation or faith, they will automatically work out for themselves that they are atheists.
I’m fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A gene is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information. Modern biology is becoming very much a branch of information technology.
I think the written word is probably the best medium of communication because you have time to reflect, you have time to choose your words, to get your sentences exactly right. Whereas when you’re being interviewed, say, you have to talk on the fly, you have to improvise, you can change sentences around, and they’re not exactly right.
I read novels for entertainment rather than for edification, so I tend not to read the sort of novels that are said to illuminate the human condition.
I get the feeling more and more that religion is being left behind.
I didn’t know children were expected to have literary heroes, but I certainly had one, and I even identified with him at one time: Doctor Dolittle, whom I now half identify with the Charles Darwin of Beagle days.
I am baffled by the way sophisticated theologians who know Adam and Eve never existed still keep talking about it.
From a Darwinian perspective, it is clear what pain is doing. It’s a warning: ‘Don’t do that again.’ If you burn yourself, you’re never going to pick up a live coal again.
Einstein was adamant in rejecting all ideas of a personal god.
Christopher Hitchens was a writer and an orator with a matchless style, commanding a vocabulary and a range of literary and historical allusion far wider than anybody I know.
As Darwin himself was at pains to point out, natural selection is all about differential survival within species, not between them.
A native speaker of English who has never read a word of the King James Bible is verging on the barbarian.
When you make machines that are capable of obeying instructions slavishly, and among those instructions are ‘duplicate me’ instructions, then of course the system is wide open to exploitation by parasites.
What Darwinian theory shows us is that all human races are extremely close to each other. None of them is in any sense ancestral to any other; none of them is more primitive than any other. We are all modern races of exactly equal status, evolutionarily speaking.
We are a very, very unusual species.
There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can’t prove that there aren’t any, so shouldn’t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?
The universe doesn’t owe us condolence or consolation; it doesn’t owe us a nice warm feeling inside.
The interesting question would be whether there’s a Darwinian process, a kind of selection process whereby some memes are more likely to spread than others, because people like them, because they’re popular, because they’re catchy or whatever it might be.
The Bible was written by fallible human beings.
Science has taught us, against all intuition, that apparently solid things like crystals and rocks are really almost entirely composed of empty space. And the familiar illustration is the nucleus of an atom is a fly in the middle of a sports stadium, and the next atom is in the next sports stadium.
Public sharing is an important part of science.
Once a viral program gets started, there is nothing to stop it.
My personal feeling is that understanding evolution led me to atheism.
It’s an important point to realize that the genetic programming of our lives is not fully deterministic. It is statistical – it is in any animal merely statistical – not deterministic.
Islands are natural workshops of evolution.
If you set out in a spaceship to find the one planet in the galaxy that has life, the odds against your finding it would be so great that the task would be indistinguishable, in practice, from impossible.
If Bush and Blair are eventually put on trial for war crimes, I shall not be among those pressing for them to be hanged.
I’m afraid the Internet is filled with people using really very intemperate language.
I think the world’s always a better place if people are filled with understanding.
I once wrote that anybody who believes the world is only 6,000 years old is either ignorant, stupid, insane or wicked.
I don’t think that it’s up to government to dictate what people should wear.
I didn’t have a very starry school career, I was medium to above average, nothing special.
I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.
For the first half of geological time our ancestors were bacteria. Most creatures still are bacteria, and each one of our trillions of cells is a colony of bacteria.
Don’t kid yourself that you’re going to live again after you’re dead; you’re not. Make the most of the one life you’ve got. Live it to the full.
Christopher Hitchens was a great warrior, a magnificent orator, a pugilist and a gentleman. He was kind, but he took no prisoners when arguing with idiots.
As a liberal, I would hesitate to propose a blanket ban on any style of dress because of the implications for individual liberty and freedom of choice.
A guided missile corrects its trajectory as it flies, homing in, say, on the heat of a jet plane’s exhaust. A great improvement on a simple ballistic shell, it still cannot discriminate particular targets. It could not zero in on a designated New York skyscraper if launched from as far away as Boston.
When the ancestors of the cheetah first began pursuing the ancestors of the gazelle, neither of them could run as fast as they can today.
We’ve all been brought up with the view that religion has some kind of special privileged status. You’re not allowed to criticise it.
We are a unique ape. We have language. Other animals have systems of communication that fall far short of that. They don’t have the same ability to communicate complicated conditionals and what-ifs and talk about things that are not present.
There is something cheap about magic that works just because it is magic.
The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is in principle capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity.
The idea of an afterlife where you can be reunited with loved ones can be immensely consoling – though not to me.
The Bible should be taught, but emphatically not as reality. It is fiction, myth, poetry, anything but reality. As such it needs to be taught because it underlies so much of our literature and our culture.
Science coverage could be improved by the recognition that science is timeless, and therefore science stories should not need to be pegged to an item in the news.
Presumably what happened to Jesus was what happens to all of us when we die. We decompose. Accounts of Jesus’s resurrection and ascension are about as well-documented as Jack and the Beanstalk.
Of course, we would love to know more about the exact moment of Big Bang, but interposing an outside intelligence does nothing to add to that knowledge, as we still know nothing about the creation of that intelligence.
My interest in biology was pretty much always on the philosophical side.
It’s a horrible idea that God, this paragon of wisdom and knowledge, power, couldn’t think of a better way to forgive us our sins than to come down to Earth in his alter ego as his son and have himself hideously tortured and executed so that he could forgive himself.
Intelligent life on a planet comes of age when it first works out the reason for its own existence.
If you read Islamic creationist literature, it’s pretty much lifted from American evangelical literature.
I’ve never been the sort of firebrand that I’ve been made out to be. I’m actually quite a mild person.
I’m a cultural Christian in the same way many of my friends call themselves cultural Jews or cultural Muslims.
I think that people in the Bible Belt are far less monolithically religious than many people imagine. There are lots and lots of people who are free-thinking, secularists, or atheists in the so-called Bible Belt.
I mean I think that when you’ve got a big brain, when you find yourself planted in a world with a brain big enough to understand quite a lot of what you see around you, but not everything, you naturally fall to thinking about the deep mysteries. Where do we come from? Where does the world come from? Where does the universe come from?
I don’t know what to think about magic and fairy tales.
I did not end up as broadly educated as my Cambridge colleagues, but I graduated probably better equipped to write a book on my chosen subject.
I accept that there may be things far grander and more incomprehensible than we can possibly imagine.
For me, the level at which natural selection causes the phenomenon of adaptation is the level of the replicator – the gene.
Don’t feel embarrassed if you’ve never heard of William Lane Craig. He parades himself as a philosopher, but none of the professors of philosophy whom I consulted had heard his name, either.
By all means let’s be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
Anybody who has something sensible or worthwhile to say should be able to say it calmly and soberly, relying on the words themselves to convey his meaning, without resorting to yelling.
A good theory explains a lot but postulates little.
When brains get sufficiently big, presumably, as human brains have, consciousness seems to emerge.
We should not live by Darwinian principles. But Darwin explains how we got here.
Tortoises can survive for weeks without food or water, easily long enough to float in the Humboldt Current from South America to the Galapagos Islands.
There does seem to be a sense in which physics has gone beyond what human intuition can understand. We shouldn’t be too surprised about that because we’re evolved to understand things that move at a medium pace at a medium scale. We can’t cope with the very tiny scale of quantum physics or the very large scale of relativity.
The state of Israel seems to owe its very existence to the American Jewish vote, while at the same time consigning the non-religious to political oblivion.
The feminists taught us about consciousness-raising.
Sometimes I think it’s possible to mistake desire for clarity and talking in a no-nonsense way for aggression.
Saddam Hussein could have provided irreplaceable help to future historians of the Iran/Iraq war, of the invasion of Kuwait, and of the subsequent era of sanctions culminating in the current invasion.
Physicists are working on the Big Bang, and one day they may or may not solve it.
Of course in science there are things that are open to doubt and things need to be discussed. But among the things that science does know, evolution is about as certain as anything we know.
My decision to be a scientist was a bit of a drift really, more or less by default.
It would be intolerant if I advocated the banning of religion, but of course I never have.
In the original introduction to the word meme in the last chapter of ‘The Selfish Gene,’ I did actually use the metaphor of a ‘virus.’ So when anybody talks about something going viral on the Internet, that is exactly what a meme is, and it looks as though the word has been appropriated for a subset of that.
If we are too friendly to nice, decent bishops, we run the risk of buying into the fiction that there’s something virtuous about believing things because of faith rather than because of evidence. We run the risk of betraying scientific enlightenment.
I’m sure Obama is an atheist; I’m sure Kennedy was an atheist, but I doubt if Pope Frank is.
I would like to find a way in which people in Saudi Arabia could learn that they can be something other than a Muslim. Some people may not realize this. Of course, there is the problem that you can get in trouble or get stoned.
I think looking back to my own childhood, the fact that so many of the stories I read allowed the possibility of frogs turning into princes, whether that has a sort of insidious affect on rationality, I’m not sure. Perhaps it’s something for research.
I love romantic poetry.
I don’t do formal debates, because formal debates where you have two people up on a stage in equal status, and each of them is given 20 minutes to give their point of view, and then 10 minutes for a rebuttal, or whatever, that creates the illusion that you really do have here two equal points of view of equal scientific standing.
I detest ‘Jingle Bells,’ ‘White Christmas,’ ‘Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer,’ and the obscene spending bonanza that nowadays seems to occupy not just December, but November and much of October, too.
Humans are just a very, very small part of the panoply of life, and it is arguable that in a certain sense, humans have emancipated themselves from Darwinian selection.
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.
Discrimination is not liberal. Arguing against discrimination is not intolerance.
Bishops sit in the House of Lords automatically.
An Internet meme is a hijacking of the original idea. Instead of mutating by random change and spreading by a form of Darwinian selection, Internet memes are altered deliberately by human creativity. There is no attempt at accuracy of copying, as with genes – and as with memes in their original version.